The article below may contain offensive and/or incorrect content.
The cognitive mechanism underlying decisions based on sequential samples has been found to be affected by whether multiple alternatives are evaluated together or whether each alternative is evaluated individually. In this experiment, we examined whether evaluation format can also lead to different preference orders among risky alternatives. We hypothesized that because of differences in computational demands posed by the 2 evaluation formats, there would be differences in the type of the cognitive mechanism deployed: a risk-return mechanism, that trades off the mean reward and risk of an alternative, or a selective-accumulator mechanism, that sums the rewards of each alternative, with a higher weight to more extreme payoffs. Each participant rated the same set of alternatives (sequences of payoffs from slot machines) in both a one-by-one and a grouped evaluation format. The mean and the variance of the payoff distributions of each alternative were varied orthogonally. As predicted, in the grouped (but not in the one-by-one) condition, the impact of the variance on participants' ratings interacted with the mean payoff. Specifically, participants were risk averse for alternatives with a low mean payoff and risk seeking for alternatives with a high mean payoff. Computational modeling showed that the majority of participants were best described by a risk–return model in the one-by-one condition but by a selective-accumulator model in the grouped condition. Our results underline the importance of studying the cognitive foundations of risk attitudes in order to understand how they are shaped by the structure of a given decision task. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)





Departments
Authors
Libraries
Current Articles
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Guiding gender-atypical kids through puberty
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Pandemic worsens child mental health crisis
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Being heard is more important to some people than following COVID-19 regulations
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Workaholics at a greater risk of depression
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Can kids have seasonal affective disorder?
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Video » NIMH Expert Dr. Krystal Lewis Discusses Managing Stress & Anxiety
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Scientific Meeting » NIMH Livestream Event: Managing Stress and Anxiety
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: A third of Americans don't see systemic racism as a barrier to good health
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: The challenge of pandemic fatigue is hitting people hard
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: How and why to take a break from the news
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: What brain imaging tells us about decluttering our minds
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Blog Post » Showing Support for Basic Researchers
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: How to reduce news-related stress for better mental health
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Five myths about loneliness
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: How to help someone struggling with suicidal ideation
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Better sleep hygiene is crucial when you're anxious
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: How to remotivate kids for more distance learning
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: How to set goals you’ll actually achieve
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: To 'keep sharp' this year, keep learning
- Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Mental health is one of the biggest issues facing 2021